Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40426032›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Well-being: pathway to life satisfaction among older persons in Ghana.

Joseph Kojo Oduro, Mary Ama Oduro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joseph Kojo OduroDepartment of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana. joseph.oduro@ucc.edu.gh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1347-7102
Mary Ama OduroDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, the number of older people is rising. However, few studies have examined well-being as the pathway to higher life satisfaction of older persons in Ghana.

methodsThe study used longitudinal data from the 2014/15 Study of Global Ageing and Adult Health (SAGE) Wave 2 to investigate factors of high life satisfaction among older persons in Ghana. The data was analysed using a multilevel logistic regression model, taking into account both individual-level characteristics and community-level variables. The model's output was presented as odds ratios (OR), to show the likelihood of high life satisfaction based on various well-being measures, revealing which components of well-being have the greatest influence on life happiness in older persons.

resultsHigh levels of emotional (OR=1.67, 95% CI=1.25, 2.23), psychological (OR=1.60, 95% CI=1.21, 2.12), and spiritual (OR=2.36, 95% CI=1.72, 3.25) well-being were associated with higher odds of high life satisfaction. Conversely, a high level of physical well-being was linked to lower odds of high life satisfaction (OR=0.75, 95% CI=0.56, 1.01).

conclusionThe higher the levels of emotional, psychological, and spiritual well-being, the higher the life satisfaction of older persons 60 years and older. However, the higher the level of self-reported physical well-being, the less likely to experience high life satisfaction. Emphasis should be on high physical well-being, promoting high life satisfaction and healthy ageing among older persons in Ghana.

Indexed as

AgingPersonal SatisfactionQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGhanaHappinessHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedEmotional well-beingGhanaLife satisfactionOlder personsPhysical well-beingPsychological well-beingSpiritual well-being

Identifiers

PMID40426032
PMCPMC12117695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.