ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025
Health-related quality of life in the UK Biobank Experience of Pain follow-up study: a comparison with general population norms.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The UK Biobank (UKB) is a population-based resource of genetic, health, lifestyle, sociodemographic, and linked clinical data for approximately 500 000 volunteers. Previous analyses of health determinants have shown that the UKB is not representative of the population from which it is drawn. However, representativeness from a general health-outcomes perspective is unknown, but could be assessed using health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire responses and expected population norms. The HRQoL responses, collected using the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L instrument, were available for participants who completed the experience of pain follow-up survey (n = 167 199). We comprehensively characterized follow-up participant HRQoL and made age and sex-specific comparisons with normative data derived from the nationally representative Health Survey for England (2014). The pattern of reported problems mirrored those of the expected population norms, but with differences in magnitude: for both sexes, at all ages (except >74 years) the prevalence/odds of problems were greater for UKB participants. Compared with the norms, HRQoL of participants in this subsample did not follow a pattern of decline as expected with increasing age. While we did find differences in patterns between the EoPQ cohort and expected population HRQoL, the absolute differences were only modest, and this should provide reassurance for users of the data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.