Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40426005›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Space-time interference between the length and duration of static lines.

Daniel Bratzke, Rolf Ulrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel BratzkeDepartment of Psychology, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany. bratzke@uni-bremen.de.
Rolf UlrichDepartment of Psychology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigated space-time interference with static lines. In three preregistered online experiments, participants were presented with lines of different lengths and durations and asked to provide length or duration estimates after each trial on a visual analogue scale. Results showed bidirectional space-time interference in all experiments, with a slight asymmetry toward larger space-on-time than time-on-space interference when the target dimension was indicated only after stimulus presentation. Overall, the present findings add to a growing body of evidence demonstrating that space-time interference is more flexible than previously assumed.

Indexed as

AttentionOrientationPattern Recognition, VisualSize PerceptionTime PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultCross-dimensional interferenceSpace–time interactionTime perception

Identifiers

PMID40426005
PMCPMC12204980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.