Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40425961›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Automated Body Composition Analysis Using DAFS Express on 2D MRI Slices at L3 Vertebral Level.

Varun Akella, Razeyeh Bagherinasab, Hyunwoo Lee, Jia Ming Li, Long Nguyen, Mushfiqus Salehin, Vincent Tze Yang Chow, Karteek Popuri, Mirza Faisal Beg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Varun AkellaSchool of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada.
Razeyeh BagherinasabSchool of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada.
Hyunwoo LeeDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Jia Ming LiSchool of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada.
Long NguyenSchool of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada.
Mushfiqus SalehinDepartment of Computer Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.
Vincent Tze Yang ChowSchool of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada.
Karteek PopuriDepartment of Computer Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.
Mirza Faisal BegSchool of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada. faisal-admin@sfu.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9952-5768

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body composition analysis is vital in assessing health conditions such as obesity, sarcopenia, and metabolic syndromes. MRI provides detailed images of skeletal muscle (SM), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), but their manual segmentation is labor-intensive and limits clinical applicability. This study validates an automated tool for MRI-based 2D body composition analysis (Data Analysis Facilitation Suite (DAFS) Express), comparing its automated measurements with expert manual segmentations using UK Biobank data. A cohort of 399 participants from the UK Biobank dataset was selected, yielding 423 single L3 slices for analysis. DAFS Express performed automated segmentations of SM, VAT, and SAT, which were then manually corrected by expert raters for validation. Evaluation metrics included Jaccard coefficients, Dice scores, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Bland-Altman Plots to assess segmentation agreement and reliability. High agreements were observed between automated and manual segmentations with mean Jaccard scores: SM 99.03%, VAT 95.25%, and SAT 99.57%, and mean Dice scores: SM 99.51%, VAT 97.41%, and SAT 99.78%. Cross-sectional area comparisons showed consistent measurements, with automated methods closely matching manual measurements for SM and SAT, and slightly higher values for VAT (SM: auto 132.51 cm

Indexed as

Body CompositionImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntra-Abdominal FatMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalReproducibility of ResultsArtificial intelligenceAutomated 2D segmentationBody compositionMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID40425961
PMCPMC12920845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.