ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Development of a No-Reference CT Image Quality Assessment Method Using RadImageNet Pre-trained Deep Learning Models.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- No Reproducibility, No Progress: Rethinking CT Benchmarking.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate assessment of computed tomography (CT) image quality is crucial for ensuring diagnostic accuracy, optimizing imaging protocols, and preventing excessive radiation exposure. In clinical settings, where high-quality reference images are often unavailable, developing no-reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA) methods is essential. Recently, CT-NR-IQA methods using deep learning have been widely studied; however, significant challenges remain in handling multiple degradation factors and accurately reflecting real-world degradations. To address these issues, we propose a novel CT-NR-IQA method. Our approach utilizes a dataset that combines two degradation factors (noise and blur) to train convolutional neural network (CNN) models capable of handling multiple degradation factors. Additionally, we leveraged RadImageNet pre-trained models (ResNet50, DenseNet121, InceptionV3, and InceptionResNetV2), allowing the models to learn deep features from large-scale real clinical images, thus enhancing adaptability to real-world degradations without relying on artificially degraded images. The models' performances were evaluated by measuring the correlation between the subjective scores and predicted image quality scores for both artificially degraded and real clinical image datasets. The results demonstrated positive correlations between the subjective and predicted scores for both datasets. In particular, ResNet50 showed the best performance, with a correlation coefficient of 0.910 for the artificially degraded images and 0.831 for the real clinical images. These findings indicate that the proposed method could serve as a potential surrogate for subjective assessment in CT-NR-IQA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.