ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
PlaNet-S: an Automatic Semantic Segmentation Model for Placenta Using U-Net and SegNeXt.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Normative volumetric growth modeling of the whole fetal body, placenta, and amniotic fluid for three-dimensional T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Recent innovations in placental MRI: Integrating visualization and functional imaging.Placenta · 2026Review
- Normative volumetric growth modeling of the whole fetal body, placenta and amniotic fluid for 3-dimensional T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a fully automated semantic placenta segmentation model that integrates the U-Net and SegNeXt architectures through ensemble learning. A total of 218 pregnant women with suspected placental abnormalities who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were enrolled, yielding 1090 annotated images for developing a deep learning model for placental segmentation. The images were standardized and divided into training and test sets. The performance of Placental Segmentation Network (PlaNet-S), which integrates U-Net and SegNeXt within an ensemble framework, was assessed using Intersection over Union (IoU) and counting connected components (CCC) against the U-Net, U-Net + + , and DS-transUNet. PlaNet-S had significantly higher IoU (0.78, SD = 0.10) than that of U-Net (0.73, SD = 0.13) (p < 0.005) and DS-transUNet (0.64, SD = 0.16) (p < 0.005), while the difference with U-Net + + (0.77, SD = 0.12) was not statistically significant. The CCC for PlaNet-S was significantly higher than that for U-Net (p < 0.005), U-Net + + (p < 0.005), and DS-transUNet (p < 0.005), matching the ground truth in 86.0%, 56.7%, 67.9%, and 20.9% of the cases, respectively. PlaNet-S achieved higher IoU than U-Net and DS-transUNet, and comparable IoU to U-Net + + . Moreover, PlaNet-S significantly outperformed all three models in CCC, indicating better agreement with the ground truth. This model addresses the challenges of time-consuming physician-assisted manual segmentation and offers the potential for diverse applications in placental imaging analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.