ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2025
Processing of Descriptive and Prescriptive Stereotypes About Men and Women and Electrophysiological Correlates.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gender stereotypes are a set of beliefs about men and women, including both descriptive beliefs, which refer to how men and women are, and prescriptive beliefs, which point to what men and women ought to be (e.g., Prentice & Carranza, 2002). To our knowledge, no electrophysiological studies have addressed the prescriptive dimension. Therefore, the present study pursued two main objectives: first, to compare the level of acceptance, reaction times (RTs), and the event-related brain potentials (ERPs) associated with the processing of incongruent descriptive and prescriptive stereotypes; and second, to compare the level of acceptance, RTs, and ERPs associated with the processing of these stereotypes depending on whether they refer to men or women. Regarding the first objective, prescriptive stereotypes present a higher number of disagreements, as well as smaller RTs, revealing certain rejection attitudes towards prescriptive stereotypes. In addition, descriptive stereotypes elicit a greater amplitude of the LPP component, revealing a higher evaluation by the participant compared to prescriptive stereotypes. On the other hand, stereotypes referring to women are resolved earlier compared to male stereotypes. Likewise, the amplitude of the N400 component also reveals some flexibilization of feminine stereotypes. Finally, female participants present faster RTs than male participants, which might be reflecting a facilitation of the processing of gender stereotypes due to a greater awareness about gender issues. These results seem to indicate a general acceptance of the conquest of traditionally male spaces by women, while the reverse process is still in an incipient state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40425946What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.