Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40425906›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2025

How perceptions of bone marrow donation costs affect donation behavior: survey evidence from a large donor registry.

Michael Haylock, Patrick Kampkötter, Mario Macis, Susanne Seitz, Robert Slonim, Edith Wienand, Daniel Wiesen, Alexander H Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael HaylockCINCH Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. michael.haylock@uni-due.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6086-6146
Patrick KampkötterFaculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Nauklerstraße 47, 72074, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9728-8105
Mario MacisJohns Hopkins University, Carey Business School, IZA, and NBER, Baltimore, USA.
Susanne SeitzDKMS Group gGmbH Tübingen, Kressbach 1, 72072, Tübingen, Germany.
Robert SlonimUniversity of Technology Sydney and IZA, Sydney, Australia.
Edith WienandDKMS Group gGmbH Tübingen, Kressbach 1, 72072, Tübingen, Germany.
Daniel WiesenUniversity of Cologne, Department of Health Care Management and Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4627-1730
Alexander H SchmidtDKMS Group gGmbH Tübingen, Kressbach 1, 72072, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past three decades, advancements in collection methods for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation substantially reduced invasiveness and safety concerns. To what extent, however, registered donors are informed about extraction methods and how their beliefs drive their willingness to follow through with a donation is not well understood. Inaccurate beliefs about extraction methods may cause donors to overestimate their perceived cost, potentially reducing donations. In a survey with about 24,000 potential donors in Germany's largest stem-cell registry, we investigate how beliefs about extraction methods affect potential donors' willingness to follow through with a stem cell donation. We find widespread misconceptions about extraction methods, with many donors attributing a significant fraction of stem cell extractions to be coming from never-used methods. Importantly, a lack of knowledge and misconceptions about extraction methods persist among registered donors, often anchored to methods that prevailed at the time of registration. Exploring the link between donors' beliefs and their (stated) willingness to donate, we find that accurate beliefs about lower extraction costs correlate with a 2.2-2.9 percentage points higher willingness to donate, representing a 40% reduction in donor unavailability. Our results highlight the need for informational campaigns to correct donors' misconceptions and potentially save more lives among blood cancer patients.

Indexed as

Bone Marrow TransplantationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleGermanyHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAvailabilityInformationPerceived costsStem cell extraction methodsUnrelated stem cell donation

Identifiers

PMID40425906
PMCPMC12618348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.