Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40425903›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025

Process dynamics of serial biases in visual perception and working memory processes.

Hyung-Bum Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hyung-Bum ParkInstitute for Mind and Biology, University of Chicago, 940 East 57 Th St., Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. hbpark@uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6560-2406

Funding

The Distinction Between Number and Resolution in Visual Working MemoryR01MH087214 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI AWH, EDWARD, VOGEL, EDWARD K · 2009 to 2023
$11.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087214NIMH NIH HHS R01MH087214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serial dependence, a systematic bias in the perceptual decision of current stimuli toward previously encountered ones, has been debated with regard to its locus of processing, with evidence supporting both perceptual processes and post-perceptual working memory (WM) accounts. This study examined the temporal and process-specific dynamics of serial biases across perception and WM processes by analyzing behavioral responses and mouse trajectories. Participants performed two tasks: an immediate perceptual report requiring color matching on a color-wheel with the target color remained visible, and a delayed WM recall consisting of dual responses, a consolidation report immediately after target and mask offset and a retrieval report after a short delay. The results revealed a shift from repulsive biases in immediate perceptual reports to moderate and stronger attraction in WM consolidation and retrieval reports, respectively. Additionally, mouse trajectory analysis further identified a repulsion-to-attraction transition during WM consolidation, suggesting an interplay between sensory adaptation and mnemonic processes. These findings support a mnemonic origin of positive serial dependence, with independent components of perception and WM jointly shaping the output serial bias.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermMental RecallVisual PerceptionAdultColor PerceptionFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultMouse trajectorySerial dependenceWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID40425903
PMCPMC12627195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.