ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Laparoscopic gastrectomy reduced peritoneal recurrence in Borrmann type IV gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is Laparoscopic/Robotic Total Gastrectomy a Reasonable and Adequate Treatment for Proximal Advanced Gastric Cancer?Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Review
- Borrmann type IV gastric cancer exhibits distinct clinicopathological features and extremely poor prognosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent evidence on the surgical and oncological safety of laparoscopic surgery in patients with Borrmann type IV (B-IV) advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains insufficient. This study aimed to compare the surgical and prognostic outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) in patients with B-IV AGC.
methodsPatients with primary B-IV gastric cancer who underwent LG or OG between 2003 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. We conducted 1:1 propensity score matching using covariates including sex, age, body mass index, operation type, clinical T and N stages, pathological TNM stage, tumor size, and tumor location. Surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, 5-year survival and recurrence outcomes, and risk factors for peritoneal recurrence were compared between the two groups.
resultsOf 401 patients enrolled, 106 from each of the LG and OG groups were matched, with all standardized differences < 0.1. The LG had significantly fewer wound infections (P = 0.029), intra-abdominal abscesses (P = 0.035) and a lower peritoneal recurrence rate (5-year cumulative incidence: 48.8% vs. 62.8%, P = 0.032; hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.96) compared to the OG group, along with a trend toward improved 5-year overall survival (LG vs. OG: 37.0% vs. 26.2%, P = 0.174; hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.11). Multivariate analyses revealed a 32.6% decrease in the hazard ratio for peritoneal recurrence in the LG group (P = 0.048).
conclusionsLG significantly reduced peritoneal recurrence with fewer wound and intra-abdominal infectious complications in patients with B-IV AGC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.