Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40425851›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2025

Neuronal network analysis during short time transcranial direct current stimulation with permanent EEG measurement in early childhood: a feasibility study.

Hannes Brehme, Michael Kölch, Johannes Buchmann, Christoph Berger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannes BrehmeDepartment of Psychiatry, Neurology, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics in Childhood and Adolescence, Rostock University Medical Center, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany. Hannes.brehme@med.uni-rostock.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9381-609X
Michael KölchDepartment of Psychiatry, Neurology, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics in Childhood and Adolescence, Rostock University Medical Center, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany.
Johannes BuchmannDepartment of Psychiatry, Neurology, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics in Childhood and Adolescence, Rostock University Medical Center, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany.
Christoph BergerDepartment of Psychiatry, Neurology, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics in Childhood and Adolescence, Rostock University Medical Center, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as a non-invasive stimulation is still in the experimental stage for many psychiatric disorders even in adults. The use of tDCS provides an opportunity to influence neural networks and their functional connectivity. How tDCS affects cortical networks and how it influences the functional connectivity of the developing brain is largely unknown. The electroencephalography (EEG) derivation, which has a precise temporal resolution, is well established in the clinical routine in childhood and, in combination with tDCS, it will give us more information about the changes in connectivity during stimulation. Furthermore, objective stress markers should be established for non-invasive stimulation at younger ages. In this study, we investigated how well we can measure connectivity changes under tDCS in children aged 4 to 8 using EEG. The exclusion criterion was epilepsy. Anodal stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was performed. Throughout the stimulation, EEG and ECG measurements were taken. Heart rate variability was calculated from the ECG lead as a stress marker. The combination of tDCS and EEG was applicable and not associated with increased stress levels. It was shown to be technically feasible and to provide information about changes in connectivity. This may allow a more specific and targeted use of tDCS in the developing brain. It would be convenient to use it in children because it does not require pharmacological intervention, which children can tolerate, unlike, for example, fMRI.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyNerve NetTranscranial Direct Current StimulationChildChild, PreschoolElectrocardiographyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleChildhoodDeveloping brainEEGNon-invasive stimulationtDCS

Identifiers

PMID40425851
PMCPMC12479589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.