Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40425818›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Deacetylation of nuclear AIF provides a braking mechanism for caspase-independent chromatinolysis and necrotic brain injury.

Chen Hu, Jichuan Geng, Peipei Shan, Tongqing Zhang, Zhuqing Zhang, Xiaoyu Zhang, Menghan Lin, Xiaoxia Zhang, Dong Chang, Baokun He and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Chen Hu *Biomedical Research Institute, School of Life Sciences and Medicine, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, 255049, China.
Jichuan Geng *Biomedical Research Institute, School of Life Sciences and Medicine, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, 255049, China.
Peipei ShanInstitute of Translational Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, College of Medicine, Qingdao University, 38 Dengzhou Rd, Qingdao, 266021, China.
Tongqing ZhangBiomedical Research Institute, School of Life Sciences and Medicine, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, 255049, China.
Zhuqing ZhangBiomedical Research Institute, School of Life Sciences and Medicine, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, 255049, China.
Xiaoyu ZhangBiomedical Research Institute, School of Life Sciences and Medicine, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, 255049, China.
Menghan LinBiomedical Research Institute, School of Life Sciences and Medicine, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, 255049, China.
Xiaoxia ZhangBiomedical Research Institute, School of Life Sciences and Medicine, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, 255049, China.
Dong ChangBiomedical Research Institute, School of Life Sciences and Medicine, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, 255049, China.
Baokun HeInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica, The Fourth Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518033, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4019-4922
Deshui JiaLaboratory of Cancer Genomics and Biology, Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201620, China.
Mary ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 4100 John R, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Chuangui WangBiomedical Research Institute, School of Life Sciences and Medicine, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, 255049, China. cgwang24@sdut.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1213-946X
Shengping ZhangBiomedical Research Institute, School of Life Sciences and Medicine, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo, 255049, China. spzhang@sdut.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4088-2768

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Programmed necrosis involves three consecutive stages: initiation, propagation, and execution. The initiation of necrosis has been widely studied, but due to the diversity and pleiotropy of the initiating pathways, it is difficult to identify ideal targets for necrosis inhibition from upstream necrosis pathways. Genetic evidence suggests that caspase-independent chromatinolysis, an execution process in multiple forms of necrosis, could be targeted to inhibit necrosis, but its regulatory mechanisms remain unclear. Previous studies suggest that the apoptosis-inducing factor AIF promotes chromatinolysis and caspase-independent necrosis, and its cytosol-to-nucleus translocation induces irreversible chromatinolysis. Here we report that AIF acetylation at lysine 295 is required for its cytosol-to-nucleus translocation and conduction of caspase-independent chromatinolysis upon necrotic stimuli, the SIRT1 deacetylase blocks necrotic chromatinolysis via deacetylating AIF, and pharmacological activation of SIRT1 inhibits AIF-dependent chromatinolysis and necrotic brain injury. Our results reveal a reversible blocking mechanism for AIF-dependent chromatinolysis and caspase-independent necrosis, supporting that targeting the late necrosis stage is a promising therapeutic strategy for treatment of necrosis-associated diseases.

Indexed as

Apoptosis Inducing FactorCaspasesCell NucleusChromatinNecrosisAcetylationAnimalsHumansMiceSirtuin 1Apoptosis Inducing FactorCaspasesChromatinSirtuin 1

Identifiers

PMID40425818
PMCPMC12116903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.