Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40425787›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

Advancing breast, lung and prostate cancer research with federated learning. A systematic review.

Anshu Ankolekar, Sebastian Boie, Maryam Abdollahyan, Emanuela Gadaleta, Seyed Alireza Hasheminasab, Guang Yang, Charles Beauville, Nikolaos Dikaios, George Anthony Kastis, Michael Bussmann and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Anshu AnkolekarDepartment of Precision Medicine, GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. a.ankolekar@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Sebastian BoiePfizer Pharma GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Maryam AbdollahyanCentre for Cancer Biomarkers and Biotherapeutics, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Emanuela GadaletaCentre for Cancer Biomarkers and Biotherapeutics, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Seyed Alireza HasheminasabCentre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7221-1948
Guang YangBioengineering Department and Imperial-X, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7344-7733
Charles BeauvilleFlower Labs, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2946-5282
Nikolaos DikaiosMathematics Research Center, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9865-0260
George Anthony KastisMathematics Research Center, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Michael BussmannHelmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
Claude ChelalaCentre for Cancer Biomarkers and Biotherapeutics, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Sara KhalidCentre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Hagen KrugerPfizer Pharma GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Philippe LambinDepartment of Precision Medicine, GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Giorgos PapanastasiouArtificial Intelligence Data and Analytics, Digital, Pfizer Inc, New York, USA. georgios.papanastasiou@pfizer.com.
OPTIMA Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) is advancing cancer research by enabling privacy-preserving collaborative training of machine learning (ML) models on diverse, multi-centre data. This systematic review synthesises current knowledge on state-of-the-art FL in oncology, focusing on breast, lung, and prostate cancer. Unlike previous surveys, we critically evaluate FL's real-world implementation and impact, demonstrating its effectiveness in enhancing ML generalisability and performance in clinical settings. Our analysis reveals that FL outperformed centralised ML in 15 out of 25 studies, spanning diverse models and clinical applications, including multi-modal integration for precision medicine. Despite challenges identified in reproducibility and standardisation, FL demonstrates substantial potential for advancing cancer research. We propose future research focus on addressing these limitations and investigating advanced FL methods to fully harness data diversity and realise the transformative power of cutting-edge FL in cancer care.

Identifiers

PMID40425787
PMCPMC12117161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.