Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40425785›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Saliva-derived transcriptomic signature for gastric cancer detection using machine learning and leveraging publicly available datasets.

Catarina Lopes, Andreia Brandão, Manuel R Teixeira, Mário Dinis-Ribeiro, Carina Pereira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catarina LopesPrecancerous Lesions and Early Cancer Management Group, Research Center of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP)/CI-IPOP@RISE (Health Research Group), Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center Raquel Seruca (Porto.CCC), Porto, Portugal.
Andreia BrandãoCancer Genetics Group, Research Center of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP)/CI-IPOP@RISE (Health Research Group), Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center Raquel Seruca (Porto.CCC), Porto, Portugal.
Manuel R TeixeiraICBAS - School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Mário Dinis-RibeiroPrecancerous Lesions and Early Cancer Management Group, Research Center of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP)/CI-IPOP@RISE (Health Research Group), Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center Raquel Seruca (Porto.CCC), Porto, Portugal.
Carina PereiraPrecancerous Lesions and Early Cancer Management Group, Research Center of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP)/CI-IPOP@RISE (Health Research Group), Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center Raquel Seruca (Porto.CCC), Porto, Portugal. ana.martins.pereira@ipoporto.min-saude.pt.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 2021.03835.CEECINDFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UI/BD/151488/2021HORIZON EUROPE Health 101095359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saliva, a non-invasive, self-collected liquid biopsy, holds promise for early gastric cancer (GC) screening. This study aims to assess the potential of saliva as a proxy for malignant gastric transformation and its diagnostic value through transcriptomic profiling. Leveraging transcriptomic data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), we constructed and validated predictive models through machine learning algorithms within the tidymodels framework. Tissue-based models were validated on independent tissue datasets, and subsequently applied to saliva. Additionally, an independent saliva-derived model was created and evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), and likelihood ratio (LR) metrics. Tissue-derived models demonstrated excellent performance, with AUC values exceeding 0.9, but did not translate effectively to saliva, suggesting distinct molecular landscapes between tissue and saliva in GC. The saliva-specific model using support vector machine (SVM) achieved the highest performance, with an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.72-0.97), a sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI 0.58-0.95) and a specificity of 0.70 (95% CI 0.40-0.90). While saliva may not mirror tissue gene expression profile, it represents a promising non-invasive predictive tool for the early detection of GC. Further research is warranted to optimize saliva-derived molecular signatures, increasing their sensitivity and specificity for early cancer detection and advance the use of liquid biopsies in personalized medicine for improved screening, diagnostic and prognostic capabilities.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingMachine LearningSalivaStomach NeoplasmsTranscriptomeArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleSupport Vector MachineBiomarkers, TumorBioinformaticsBiomarkersEarly screeningLiquid biopsiesSalivaomics

Identifiers

PMID40425785
PMCPMC12116728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.