Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40425758›Full record

GuidelineEuropean radiology2025

Hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media: Part 1. Management of immediate and non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions in adults. Updated guidelines by the ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee.

Aart J van der Molen, Annick A J M van de Ven, Francisco Vega, Ilona A Dekkers, Remy W F Geenen, Marie-France Bellin, Michele Bertolotto, Torkel B Brismar, Olivier Clément, Jean-Michel Correas and 11 more

Abstract readReviewPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. [Contrast agent strategies in elective oncological imaging].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Aart J van der MolenDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. A.J.van_der_Molen@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2376-9424
Annick A J M van de VenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Francisco VegaDepartment of Allergy, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Ilona A DekkersDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Remy W F GeenenDepartment of Radiology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Marie-France BellinUniversity Paris Saclay, AP-HP, University Hospital Bicêtre, Department of Radiology, BioMaps, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Michele BertolottoDepartment of Radiology, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Torkel B BrismarDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Unit of Radiology, Karolinska Institute and Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital in Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Olivier ClémentUniversité de Paris, AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, DMU Imagina, Service de Radiologie, Paris, France.
Jean-Michel CorreasUniversité de Paris, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Necker, DMU Imagina, Service de Radiologie, Paris, France.
Katerina DeikeClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Clinic Bonn, and German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, DZNE, Bonn, Germany.
Gertraud HeinzDepartment of Radiology, Landesklinikum St Pölten, St Pölten, Austria.
Andreas H MahnkenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany.
Carlo A MallioFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy.
Carlo C QuattrocchiCentre for Medical Sciences CISMed, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Alexander RadbruchClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Clinic Bonn, and German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, DZNE, Bonn, Germany.
Peter ReimerDepartment of Radiology, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Giles RoditiDepartment of Radiology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Laura RomaniniDepartment of Radiology, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy.
Carmen SebastiàDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Fulvio StaculDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale Maggiore, Trieste, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypersensitivity reactions to iodine-based, gadolinium-based and ultrasound contrast agents are a heterogeneous group that occur infrequently and can be classified as either immediate or non-immediate. In imaging, most are mild or moderate, while severe reactions are very rare. A standardized risk assessment and close patient monitoring are crucial. In addition to liberal use of supportive treatment by oxygen and volume expansion, the main drugs for treatment of individual reactions include intramuscular adrenaline and H1-antihistamines, with limited indications for short-acting β2-agonists (SABA) like salbutamol or albuterol. As these reactions occur infrequently, these situations often create stress and confusion. During treatment, the stability or progression of the reaction should be constantly assessed, assigning a specific task to each team member. In addition, detailed documentation and correct classification of the severity of such reactions will help improve the risk management in future imaging studies. Regular hands-on training for all personnel involved in managing these reactions is mandatory. To help, the ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee has reviewed the literature on hypersensitivity reactions and updated its guidance on how to appropriately manage, treat, and document immediate and non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media in adults. KEY POINTS: Question Hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media may require immediate action to prevent further damage to the patient. Guidance on management would help improving preparedness. Findings Clear treatment protocols with cards or flowcharts are mandatory. Intramuscular adrenaline is the most important drug for treatment. Documentation should be agent-specific and standardized. Clinical relevance The ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee has updated its guidance on how to appropriately manage, treat, and document immediate and non-immediate hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media in adults.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaDrug HypersensitivityHypersensitivity, DelayedHypersensitivity, ImmediateAdultHumansContrast MediaClinical protocolsContrast mediaHypersensitivity (delayed)Hypersensitivity (immediate)Practice guideline

Identifiers

PMID40425758
PMCPMC12559081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.