Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40425756›Full record

GuidelineEuropean radiology2025

Hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media: Part 2. Prevention of recurrent hypersensitivity reactions in adults. Updated guidelines by the ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee.

Aart J van der Molen, Annick A J M van de Ven, Francisco Vega, Ilona A Dekkers, Remy W F Geenen, Marie-France Bellin, Michele Bertolotto, Torkel B Brismar, Olivier Clément, Jean-Michel Correas and 11 more

Abstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. [Contrast agent strategies in elective oncological imaging].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Aart J van der MolenDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. A.J.van_der_Molen@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2376-9424
Annick A J M van de VenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Francisco VegaDepartment of Allergy, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Ilona A DekkersDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Remy W F GeenenDepartment of Radiology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Marie-France BellinUniversity Paris Saclay, AP-HP, University Hospital Bicêtre, Department of Radiology, BioMaps, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Michele BertolottoDepartment of Radiology, Cattinara Hospital, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Torkel B BrismarDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Unit of Radiology, Karolinska Institute and Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital in Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Olivier ClémentUniversité de Paris, AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, DMU Imagina, Service de Radiologie, Paris, France.
Jean-Michel CorreasUniversité de Paris, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Necker, DMU Imagina, Service de Radiologie, Paris, France.
Katerina DeikeClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Clinic Bonn, and German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, DZNE, Bonn, Germany.
Gertraud HeinzDepartment of Radiology, Landesklinikum St Pölten, St Pölten, Austria.
Andreas H MahnkenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany.
Carlo A MallioFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy.
Carlo C QuattrocchiCentre for Medical Sciences CISMed, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Alexander RadbruchClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Clinic Bonn, and German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, DZNE, Bonn, Germany.
Peter ReimerDepartment of Radiology, Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Giles RoditiDepartment of Radiology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Laura RomaniniDepartment of Radiology, ASST Cremona, Cremona, Italy.
Carmen SebastiàDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Fulvio StaculDepartment of Radiology, Ospedale Maggiore, Trieste, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media are infrequent and can occur either within the first 60 min following their intravascular administration (immediate reactions) or at a later time point (non-immediate reactions). Most hypersensitivity reactions are mild or moderate, while severe reactions are rare (less than 1 in every 10,000 administrations). After any moderate or severe immediate adverse reaction, serum tryptase must be measured within 1-4 h from the onset of symptoms and at least 24 h after symptoms have disappeared to confirm a hypersensitivity reaction. At least for all moderate-to-severe hypersensitivity reactions, the patient should be referred to a drug allergy specialist for an allergy evaluation with a panel of contrast media, and optionally, all hypersensitivity reactions when local drug allergy specialist capacity allows. Selecting an alternative contrast medium based on practical experience is challenging due to its high and variable cross-reactivity; therefore, the best option is to choose an alternative based on the results of an allergy evaluation. This approach is safer and more effective than premedication for preventing recurrent hypersensitivity reactions. KEY POINTS: Question What is the optimal strategy in clinical practice to prevent recurrent hypersensitivity reactions in adults who previously experienced a hypersensitivity reaction to contrast media? Findings Serum tryptase should be measured within 1-4 h after a moderate or severe reaction, and at least all moderate or severe hypersensitivity reactions should be referred to an allergologist. Clinical relevance Management strategies should be adapted to the type and severity of the reaction, as well as the urgency of required re-administration. Changing from the culprit contrast agent to another molecule with differing side-chains is more effective than premedication.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaDrug HypersensitivityAdultHumansRecurrenceTryptasesContrast MediaTryptasesContrast mediaHypersensitivityPractice guidelinePreventionRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID40425756
PMCPMC12559128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.