Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40425755›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

ESUR consensus MRI for endometriosis: protocol, lexicon, and compartment-based analysis.

Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Miriam Dolciami, Luciana P Chamie, Adalgisa Guerra, Nishat Bharwani, Sue Freeman, Pascal Rousset, Lucia Manganaro, ESUR endometriosis working group

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Isabelle Thomassin-NaggaraImageries Radiologiques et Interventionnelles Spécialisées (IRIS), APHP Sorbonne Université Hopital Tenon, Paris, France. Isabelle.thomassin@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0919-0133
Miriam DolciamiDepartment of Imaging and Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Luciana P ChamieChamie Imagem da Mulher, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Adalgisa GuerraImaging Department of Hospital da Luz Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Nishat BharwaniDepartment of Imaging, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Sue FreemanCambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.
Pascal RoussetDepartment of radiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Lyon 1 Claude Bernard University, EMR 3738, Pierre Bénite, France.
Lucia ManganaroDepartment of Radiological, Pathological and Oncological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
ESUR endometriosis working group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo propose an update of ESUR endometriosis guidelines to reflect advances in MRI protocol and lexicon.

methodsA literature search was followed by a DELPHI process among 20 experts.

resultsPre-imaging preparation, including fasting, antiperistaltic agents, moderate bladder filling, and bowel preparation, is recommended. A comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol should include multiplanar T2W, T1W, and sequences covering the kidneys. Superficial endometriosis should be described on T1WFS as high signal intensity foci on the peritoneal surface. Endometriomas should be described in terms of multiplicity, signal intensity, central or peripheral location, and bilaterality. MRI evaluation of deep pelvic endometriosis (DE) should be performed by dividing the pelvis into compartments using two horizontal and vertical lines. A bladder nodule should be described according to location, size, and the distance to the ureteric orifice provided. A uterosacral ligament must be considered abnormal if a nodule or spiculation is visible in at least two planes or if a bright T1W spot is detected. A posterior vaginal wall nodule should be measured. External adenomyosis should be described according to location and size. The description of a rectosigmoid nodule includes location, number of nodules, longitudinal extent, distance to the anal verge, and wall thickening. The lateral compartment includes the anterior distal round ligament, the mediolateral and posterolateral parametrium. Abdominal wall nodules, ileocaecal junction, appendiceal nodules, and sigmoid nodules, must be systematically described.

conclusionA standardized MRI protocol and lexicon based on compartmental analysis are crucial for improving communication and management of patients referred with endometriosis. KEY POINTS: Question ESUR's endometriosis guidelines were last published in 2017; an update is provided to reflect advances in MRI techniques and the need for a standardized lexicon. Findings MRI protocol must include multiplanar T2W sequences, a T1W sequence, and a kidney visualization sequence. A standardized report based on a compartmental analysis is recommended. Clinical relevance Using a standard MRI protocol with compartmental analysis of endometriotic nodule locations and adopting a standardized vocabulary is crucial for comprehensive mapping and effective communication with both the patient and the surgeon.

Indexed as

EndometriosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicConsensusEndometriosis (Pelvis)Magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID40425755
PMCPMC12559084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.