ArticleScientific reports2025
Laminar fluid ejection device enables high yield and preservation of mRNA and SaRNA LNP formulations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respiratory mucosal immunity: Biological functions, diseases, prevention and therapy.Genes & diseases · 2026Review
- Advancements of mRNA-lipid nanoparticle links to gene editing and immune responses.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Target-Product and Translational Design Principles for Inhalable RNA Nanomedicines.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of messenger RNA (mRNA) and self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) vaccines has revolutionized modern vaccinology, particularly with the success of lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Intranasal administration offers a promising approach for respiratory vaccines, providing mucosal immunity at the primary entry site of pathogens. However, the impact of different aerosolization delivery systems on RNA-LNP stability, recovery volume and functionality is not well understood. In this study, we compare the effects of three intranasal administration devices- a commercial Nebulizer, a commercial Spray, and a Laminar Fluid Ejection (LFE) Device developed by Rocket Science Health- on LNP physicochemical properties, RNA encapsulation efficiency, and functional protein expression level. Our findings demonstrate that high shear forces in the commercial nebulizer delivery system significantly increase LNP particle size (85 nm to 300 nm) and polydispersity index (PDI), leading to RNA degradation and reduced encapsulation efficiency (100-39%). Conversely, the LFE Device preserved LNP structural integrity, achieving the highest RNA encapsulation efficiency (94% for mRNA, 102% for saRNA) and superior functional protein expression (3-fold higher luciferase activity compared to the CM Nebulizer). These results highlight the importance of selecting an appropriate delivery system to optimize RNA-LNP delivery and retention in intranasal applications. Our study supports the LFE Device as a viable candidate for effective RNA-LNP-based mucosal vaccine administration, with potential applications in next-generation RNA therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.