Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40425740›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Investigation and risk assessment of fluoride concentration in drinking water, soil and food products in Hamedan rural areas.

Ghorban Asgari, Mehdi Salari, Abdolmotaleb Seidmohammadi, Behroz Akbari-Adergani, Amir Hossein Mahvi, Naser Kamari, Khadije Ezzati Rastegar, Hossein Faraji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ghorban AsgariSocial Determinants of Health Research Center (SDHRC), Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Mehdi SalariLeishmaniasis Research Center, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.
Abdolmotaleb SeidmohammadiSocial Determinants of Health Research Center (SDHRC), Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Behroz Akbari-AderganiWater Safety Research Center, Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Hossein MahviDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Center for Solid Waste Research, Institute for Environmental Research, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Naser KamariDepartment of Public Health, School of Health, Research Center for Environmental Contaminants, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran.
Khadije Ezzati RastegarDepartment of Public Health, School of Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Hossein FarajiTropical and Communicable Diseases Research Center, Iranshahr University of Medical Sciences, Iranshahr, Iran. dr.farajih@gmail.com.

Funding

Hamadan University of Medical Sciences 980217862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high concentration of fluoride in the soil can serve as a pathway for this element to enter the body through food products. The purpose of this research was to investigate the fluoride concentrations in drinking water sources, regional soil, and cultivated vegetables (tomatoes, cucumbers, onions, and potatoes), as well as to assess the relationship between fluoride concentration in drinking water and fluoride content in food products. Additionally, the study aimed to evaluate the risk of exposure using a Monte Carlo simulation in Hamadan. This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted in 2021 in Hamadan. To assess water fluoride levels in different villages, 26 wells were selected. After evaluating the fluoride concentrations, two areas with water fluoride levels above the standard were identified, along with two areas with fluoride levels below the standard. From these four agricultural sites, three soil samples were collected from each location, resulting in a total of 24 soil samples. For each site, three samples of cultivated vegetables (tomatoes, cucumbers, onions, and potatoes) were also collected, yielding a total of 92 samples from areas with both high and low water fluoride concentrations. Fluoride analysis in drinking water was performed using the SPADNS method, while the fluoride content in vegetables was measured with a standard ion-selective electrode method. The results indicated that the average fluoride concentrations in the high-fluoride area for drinking water, tomatoes, onions, cucumbers, and soil were as follows: 3.5 ± 0.5 mg/L, 2.38 ± 0.15 mg/kg, 1.89 mg/kg, 0.39 ± 0.05 mg/kg, and 110.5 ± 0.03 mg/kg, respectively. In contrast, the average concentrations in the low-fluoride area were 0.3 ± 0.1 mg/L for drinking water, 11.0 ± 0.009 mg/kg for tomatoes, 1.29 ± 0.5 mg/kg for onions, 98.05 ± 0.02 mg/kg for cucumbers, and 1.6 ± 0.02 mg/kg for soil. A direct relationship was observed between the fluoride concentration in water and the amounts found in tomatoes, cucumbers, and onions. The estimated total dietary fluoride intake for children during summer and spring was 120.6 and 145.6 µg/kg/day, respectively. For adults, these values were 99.2 and 112 µg/kg/day. This study indicated that drinking water was the primary source of dietary fluoride intake in the study area. Furthermore, the hazard quotient (HQ) values for both adults and children were found to be greater than 1, confirming a potential health risk of fluorosis.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterFluoridesSoilWater Pollutants, ChemicalCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmental MonitoringHumansRisk AssessmentRural PopulationVegetablesDrinking WaterFluoridesSoilWater Pollutants, ChemicalCucumberDrinking waterFluorideHamadanOnionPotatoRisk assessmentSoilTomato

Identifiers

PMID40425740
PMCPMC12116910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.