ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of 10% vs. 5% immunoglobulin products on treatment outcomes in Kawasaki disease: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kawasaki disease (KD) is an acute vasculitis predominantly affecting younger children, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment can reduce coronary artery lesion (CAL) development. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to evaluate whether using 10% immunoglobulin products, which allow for faster IVIG administration than conventional 5% immunoglobulin products, impact KD treatment outcomes. We analyzed data of 496 patients with KD from nine Japanese hospitals, divided into 5% (n = 247) and 10% (n = 249) immunoglobulin groups. The results show that the 10% immunoglobulin group had a shorter duration of IVIG infusion compared to the 5% group (12.9 vs. 24.3 h, P < 0.001) but had a lower cumulative incidence of fever resolution 24 h after starting IVIG (66.7% vs. 77.7%, P = 0.023), and the difference was maintained thereafter. The 10% group also had more IVIG nonresponders (24% vs. 17%, P = 0.046). There were no significant differences in the interval between primary and secondary treatment or in the incidence of CALs and severe adverse events. These findings suggest that while 10% immunoglobulin products facilitate faster IVIG administration, they may lead to increased nonresponse rates, highlighting the need for further studies to optimize KD treatment protocols, such as duration of IVIG administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.