ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrating human mobility and animal movement data reveals complex space-use between humans and white-tailed deer in urban environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human expansion into wildlife habitats has increased the need to understand human-wildlife interactions, necessitating interdisciplinary approaches to assess zoonotic disease transmission risks and public health impacts. This study integrated fine-grained human foot traffic data with hourly GPS data from 38 white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), a species linked to SARS-CoV-2, brucella, and chronic wasting disease, in Howard County, Maryland. We explored spatial and temporal overlap between human and deer activity over 24 months (2018-2019) across a hexagonal tessellation with metrics like hourly popularity and visit counts. Negative binomial models were fitted to the visit counts of each deer and humans per tessellation area, using landscape features as predictors. A separate deer-only model included commercial human activity as another predictor. Spatial analysis showed deer and humans sharing spaces in the study area, with results indicating deer using more populated residential areas and areas with commercial activity. Temporal analysis showed deer avoiding commercial spaces during daytime but using them in late evening and early morning. These findings highlight the complex space use between species and the importance of integrating detailed human mobility and animal movement data when managing wildlife-human conflict and zoonotic disease transmission, particularly in urban areas with a high probability of deer-human interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.