ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrating machine learning and symbolic regression for predicting damage initiation in hybrid FRP bolted connections.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Introduction to using symbolic regression for interpretable machine learning in healthcare.Communications medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing adoption of machine learning (ML) in fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composite design has led to a reliance on black-box models, which achieve high predictive accuracy but lack interpretability. Python symbolic regression (PySR) offers a solution by deriving explicit equations that reveal the governing mechanics of composite structures. This study focuses on hybrid FRP bolted connections, which are rapidly adopted in the industry but remain insufficiently addressed in academic research. To address this gap, a framework was developed to identify key design parameters and predict damage initiation loads by integrating experimental testing, finite element modeling (FEM), and ML. Feature selection and ML models analyzed the dataset, providing insights that guided PySR in deriving interpretable equations. Hybrid L-joint specimens were fabricated and tested to determine damage initiation loads, with results validating FEM models in ABAQUS. A design of experiments approach structured the dataset, and feature selection identified key factors influencing joint performance. ML models assessed dataset quality, with Huber regression emerging as the best-performing model. Based on insights from feature analysis and ML models, PySR derived a compact, interpretable equation that provided greater accuracy and deeper physical insights than the Huber model. This equation aids hybrid L-joint design by improving the understanding of damage initiation mechanics. Beyond predictive accuracy, the findings highlight the model's scalability to different bolt sizes, equally spaced row of bolts, and stacking sequences. This study demonstrates the potential of interpretable ML in structural engineering applications, particularly for hybrid composite-metal joints, where transparent models are essential for design optimization and predictive accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.