Observational studyScientific reports2025
Association of elevated Delta-like canonical Notch ligand 1 levels with clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV2 infection.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Closing the sepsis gap: from molecular mechanisms to scalable bedside care.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Research progress on biomarkers for acute kidney injury in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soluble Delta-like ligand 1 (sDLL1) has demonstrated promising results as an early biomarker of bacterial sepsis, but its role in viral infections remains unclear. This study investigated the association between sDLL1 levels and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. In this secondary analysis of a single-center prospective observational trial, we measured plasma sDLL1 levels in 46 patients admitted with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV2 infection between December 2020 and April 2021. Patients were divided into a high-sDLL1 group, upper quartile of patients with the highest measured sDLL1 levels, and low-sDLL1 group, lower three quartiles of patients. Clinical outcomes, including secondary infections, organ dysfunction, and mortality, were compared between groups. Patients in the high-sDLL1 group (n = 11, 24%) showed higher rates of secondary infections (63% vs. 20%, OR 7, CI 1.6 to 31, p = 0.01) with higher odds of pulmonary secondary infections (46% vs. 11%, OR 6.5, CI 1.3 to 31, p = 0.03). Organ dysfunction was more prevalent in the high-sDLL1-group, indicated by a higher maximal Sequential Organ-Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (median (IQR) 11 (8.5-14) vs. 3 (0.5-8), p < 0.01) as well as higher rates of vasopressor support (64% vs. 26%, OR 5.1, CI 1.2 to 21, p = 0.03) and renal replacement therapy (36% vs. 9%, OR 6.1, CI 1.1 to 3.6, p < 0.05). The high-sDLL1 group also showed increased 90-day mortality (45% vs. 11%, OR 6.5, CI 1.3 to 31, p = 0.03). These findings suggest that high levels of sDLL1 are associated with adverse outcomes in viral sepsis, warranting further investigation in larger, prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.