ArticleScientific reports2025
Efficient field correction of low-cost particulate matter sensors using machine learning, mixed multiplicative/additive scaling and extended calibration inputs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Personal PMToxics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Particulate matter (PM) stands out as a highly perilous form of atmospheric pollution, posing significant risks to human health by triggering or worsening numerous heart, brain, and lung ailments, and even increasing the likelihood of cancer and premature mortality. Therefore, ensuring accurate monitoring of PM levels holds paramount significance, particularly urban zones of dense population. Still, achieving precise readings of PM concentration demands the use of bulky and costly equipment, typically stationed at widely spaced reference sites. The rise in popularity of low-cost PM sensors as potential substitutes has been noted, although their reliability is hampered by manufacturing flaws, instability, and susceptibility to environmental variations. In this work, we introduce a novel approach to field calibration for cheap PM sensors. Our method integrates multiplicative and additive corrections, with coefficients determined by an artificial neural network (ANN) surrogate. The ANN model accounts for environmental parameters and the sensor's PM readings as inputs, with its architecture fine-tuned to ensure optimal generalization capability. Additionally, we consider an extended set of input parameters, including local temporal changes of environmental variables, and short sequences of low-sensor readings, to further enhance calibration reliability. We validate our technique using a non-stationary measurement equipment alongside reference data acquired by government-approved reference stations in Gdansk, Poland. The obtained values of coefficients of determination reach as high as 0.89 for PM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.