Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40425631›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluating the environmental impact of cleaning the North Pacific Garbage Patch.

Matthias Egger, Andy M Booth, Thijs Bosker, Gert Everaert, Samantha L Garrard, Vilma Havas, Helga S Huntley, Albert A Koelmans, Karin Kvale, Laurent Lebreton and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Matthias EggerThe Ocean Cleanup, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. matthias.egger@theoceancleanup.com.
Andy M BoothSINTEF Ocean, Trondheim, Norway.
Thijs BoskerLeiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gert EveraertFlanders Marine Institute, Ostend, Belgium.
Samantha L GarrardPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK.
Vilma HavasSalt Lofoten, Arendal, Norway.
Helga S HuntleyRowan University, Glassboro, NJ, USA.
Albert A KoelmansAquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Karin KvaleGNS Science, Avalon, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
Laurent LebretonThe Ocean Cleanup, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Helge NiemannNIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, 't Horntje (Texel), The Netherlands.
Qiaotong PangJoint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Sciences, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Maira ProiettiThe Ocean Cleanup, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter PuskicThe Ocean Cleanup, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Camille RichonCNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Environnement Marin (LEMAR), IUEM, University Brest, Brest, France.
Sarah-Jeanne RoyerThe Ocean Cleanup, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Matthew S SavocaHopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA, USA.
Arjen TjallemaThe Ocean Cleanup, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marjolein van VulpenThe Ocean Cleanup, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Yanxu ZhangDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Ziman ZhangJoint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Sciences, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Denise M MitranoSwiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

Earth Sciences Division 80NSSC21K1145Institut des Sciences du Calcul et des Données IDEX SUPER 11-IDEX-0004New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment ANTA1801Research Council of Norway's industrial PhD programme 296814Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung PCEFP2_186856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cleanup of existing plastic pollution is crucial to mitigate its impact on marine ecosystems, but such efforts must ensure benefits outweigh potential environmental damage caused by the cleanup. Here, we present an impact assessment framework and apply it to evaluate whether cleaning the North Pacific Garbage Patch (NPGP) benefits marine life and carbon cycling, using The Ocean Cleanup as a case study. Our findings indicate that marine life is more vulnerable to plastic pollution than to macroplastic cleanup, with average vulnerability scores (1 = low, 3 = high) of 2.3 for macroplastics, 1.9 for microplastics, and 1.8 for cleanup, suggesting a net positive impact. An 80% cleanup could reduce macroplastic concentrations to within reported safe levels for marine mammals and sea turtles. Estimated cleanup-related carbon emissions [0.4-2.9 million metric tons (Mt) in total] are significantly lower than potential long-term microplastics impacts on ocean carbon sequestration (15-30 Mt C per year). However, uncertainties remain regarding effects on air-sea carbon exchange. Our framework serves as a critical tool for assessing trade-offs between plastic pollution and remediation impacts. It demonstrates the environmental net benefits of the proposed NPGP cleanup and can be adapted to similarly evaluate other remediation plans.

Indexed as

Environmental Restoration and RemediationPlasticsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsCarbon CycleEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringMicroplasticsPacific OceanMicroplasticsPlasticsWater Pollutants, ChemicalLegacy oceanic plastic pollutionMarine debrisNet environmental benefit analysisOcean plastic pollutionOpen-ocean cleanup

Identifiers

PMID40425631
PMCPMC12116914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.