ArticleScientific reports2025
A multi-center retrospective analysis of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for detecting additional positive axillary node metastasis in early breast cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (US-FNAB) in assessing additional positive axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis following sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically ALN-negative or N1 cases, aiming to refine patient management. A multi-center, retrospective analysis included 7617 patients with cT1-2 and cN0-1, who underwent US-FNAB for ALN and proceeding to SLNB or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Metastatic patterns were assessed, particularly focusing on correlations with positive FNAB results and additional ALN metastasis found during ALND, with statistical significance evaluated. Of those undergoing SLNB, 97.5% exhibited macrometastasis. In the SLNB-only group, 2.4% had 3 and more than 3 positive lymph node, compared to 19.2% in the SLNB & ALND group (P < 0.01). Among ALND patients, 63.3% had positive nodes, significantly higher in those with positive FNAB (91.9% vs. 22.8%, P < 0.001). Additionally, 40.9% were found to have additional positive ALNs in patients who underwent ALND following positive SLNB, with rates significantly higher in those with positive FNAB (60.3% vs. 35.4%, P < 0.001). LVI positivity, pT2-3, SLNR > 50% and positive FNAB were independent predictors of additional ALN metastasis in patients undergoing ALND after positive SLNB (P < 0.05). The proportion of additional positivity escalated with the number of positive SLNs. US-FNAB significantly improves the detection of additional ALN metastasis, guiding more effective strategy for ALN surgical decision-making. Our findings support the incorporation of US-FNAB into clinical practice to improve patient stratification and optimize treatment outcomes in early-stage breast cancer management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.