SynthesisScientific reports2025
Practice and associated factors of Covid-19 prevention among health professionals in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health professionals (HPs) who work on the front lines are more likely to contract COVID-19.Healthmanners of HPs impact control and prevention activities employed in answer to the contagion crisis. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the pooled level of practice and associated factors toward COVID-19 prevention among HPs in Ethiopia. PubMed, Scoups, Web of Science, Google Scholar (search engine), Google Advance, and Cochrane Library were searched from December 20, 2023 -January 30, 2024. Data was dugout using Microsoft Excel (version 10) and analysis was computed using STATA version 11. Funnel plot and quantitatively further through Egger's regression test, with P < 0.05 was used to check publication bias. I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.