Trial reportNature communications2025
On-chip 3D potency assay for prediction of clinical outcomes for cell therapy candidates for osteoarthritis.
Trial report in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03818737 (Randomized Multicenter Phase 3 Single-blind Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Corticosteroid Control to Mesenchymal Stem Cell Preparations From Autologous Bone Marrow Concentrate), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Multicenter Phase 3 Single-blind Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Corticosteroid Control to Mesenchymal Stem Cell Preparations From Autologous Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMAC), Adipose-derived Stem Cells in the Form of Stromal Vascular Fraction (SVF), and Third-party Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Manufactured From Umbilical Cord Tissue for the Treatment of Unilateral Knee Osteoarthritis (OA)
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chondrogenic niche hydrogel microspheres facilitate cartilage regeneration in osteoarthritis.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Osteoarthritis: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.MedComm · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal stromal cells therapy for remodeling the joint microenvironment: mechanisms, nanotechnology-enhanced strategies, and translation prospects.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- Plying potency assays for immunotherapy of solid tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Can alternatives to animal testing yield useful information regarding biological mechanisms and drug discovery?Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The lack of clinically predictive potency assays for cell products significantly impedes translation of these therapies. Here, we describe a microfluidic on-chip 3D system for rapid evaluation of a subset of patient-derived bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) samples used in a phase 3 multicenter trial (NCT03818737) evaluating autologous cells for relieving knee osteoarthritis pain. BMAC clinical samples cultured in the on-chip 3D system exhibit elevated levels of immunomodulatory and trophic proteins compared to 2D culture. Using analyte information from in vitro assays and patient-matched clinical data, we build linear regression prediction models for clinical outcomes. We demonstrate improved clinical prediction by cross-validation accuracy for the on-chip 3D platform compared to 2D culture. Additionally, on-chip 3D assay metrics display higher correlative power with patient pain scores compared to the 2D assay. This study establishes a potency assay with improved prediction power to accelerate translation of cell therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.