ArticleNature communications2025
Soft matrix promotes immunosuppression in tumor-resident immune cells via COX-FGF2 signaling.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The deubiquitinating enzyme USP42 promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression through PTGS2.Journal of molecular histology · 2026Article
- DONSON links tumor-cell survival to MIF-associated macrophage remodeling in small cell lung cancer.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Article
- Genomic landscape and tumor immune microenvironment of osteosarcoma: Bridging mechanistic insights to precision therapeutics.Bone reports · 2026Review
- Matrix Stiffness Directs Stemness Signatures in Breast Cancer.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Organ-Specific Migration License (OSML) theory: a novel paradigm for spatiotemporal regulation and intervention of cross-organ immune cell migration in tumor immune responses.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- Mechanical Microenvironment in Tumor Immune Evasion: Bidirectional Regulation Between Matrix Stiffness and Immune Cells and Its Therapeutic Implications.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Review
- Navigating the Tumor Microenvironment in Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Barriers to Therapy and Emerging Opportunities.Oncology research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical forces of the tumor microenvironment change dynamically during key events of tumorigenesis such as invasion and metastasis. These changes in compressive forces often affect the breast cancer cell phenotype. However, it is lesser known how these dynamic mechanical forces in the tumor microenvironment affect the phenotypes of tumor infiltrated leukocytes (TIL) and their subsequent anticancer activities. Here we find, in primary patient-derived explant cultures (PDEC) containing resident TILs, that low compression promotes a change in the original identity of breast cancer cells from luminal to a more mesenchymal and undifferentiated state. These altered tumor cells induce an upregulation of immunosuppressive cytokines such as interleukin-10 (IL-10) and Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-β), as well as polarization of macrophages towards pro-tumor M2(Gc)-type and depletion of CD8+ effector memory T-cells. These immunosuppressive events are mediated by tumor cell derived fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). We also find that FGF2 rich areas in primary tumors show enrichment in M2-like-macrophages and diminished numbers of CD8 + T and B-cells. Our results suggest that low compressive forces in the tumor microenvironment induce local immunosuppression via FGF2 secretion arising from phenotypic plasticity of tumor cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.