ArticleNature communications2025
Memristive Bellman solver for decision-making.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Bellman equation, with a resource-consuming solving process, plays a fundamental role in formulating and solving dynamic optimization problems. The realization of the Bellman solver with memristive computing-in-memory (MCIM) technology, is significant for implementing efficient dynamic decision-making. However, the iterative nature of the Bellman equation solving process poses a challenge for efficient implementation on MCIM systems, which excel at vector-matrix multiplication (VMM) operations but are less suited for iterative algorithms. In this work, by incorporating the temporal dimension and transforming the solution into recurrent dot product operations, a memristive Bellman solver (MBS) is proposed, facilitating the implementation of the Bellman equation solving process with efficient MCIM technology. The MBS effectively reduces the iteration numbers and which further enhanced by approximated solutions leveraging memristor noise. Finally, the path planning tasks are used to verify the feasibility of the proposed MBS. The theoretical derivation and experimental results demonstrate that the MBS effectively reduces the iteration cycles, facilitating the solving efficiency. This work could be a sound of choice for developing high-efficiency decision-making systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.