Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40425467›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2025

Family Physicians in Focused Practice in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Level Study of Trends From 1993/1994 Through 2021/2022.

Hina Ansari, Richard H Glazier, Susan E Schultz, Michael E Green, Kamila Premji, Eliot Frymire, Maryam Daneshvarfard, Liisa Jaakkimainen, Tara Kiran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Enhancing support for family physician anesthetists in Canada.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hina AnsariMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada hina.ansari@unityhealth.to.
Richard H GlazierMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Susan E SchultzICES Central, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael E GreenDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Kamila PremjiDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Eliot FrymireHealth Services and Policy Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Maryam DaneshvarfardMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Liisa JaakkimainenICES Central, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tara KiranMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAn adequate supply of family physicians who deliver comprehensive care is critical for addressing evolving population health needs, fostering health equity, and ensuring a cost-effective health system. Little is known about current trends of family physicians choosing focused practice and concurrent changes in comprehensive family physician numbers relative to population growth.

methodsWe conducted a repeated cross-sectional population-based study using administrative data to understand sex-stratified trends in focused practice from 1993/1994 through 2021/2022 in Ontario, Canada, accounting for population growth. For each fiscal year, we identified all active family physicians and classified them by practice type, leveraging a previously published algorithm on comprehensiveness.

resultsThe proportion of family physicians in focused practice increased from 7.7% (856/11,103) in 1993/1994 to 19.2% (3,351/17,413) in 2021/2022. The 3 most prevalent focused practice types at the end of the study period were emergency (37.0%), hospitalist (26.5%), and addiction (8.3%) medicine. A greater proportion of focused practice physicians were male (60.1%) vs female (39.9%) in 2021/2022. Over the study period, the number of family physicians increased from 104 to 118 per 100,000; however, the number of comprehensive family physicians decreased from 71 to 64 per 100,000. Of the additional 6,310 family physicians who entered the workforce, 39.5% (2,495/6,310) were in focused practice.

conclusionsOver the study period, there was a decrease in the percentage of comprehensive family physicians and a substantial increase in family physicians pursuing focused practice, particularly in emergency and hospitalist medicine. Research and policy work is needed to understand and address the complex factors driving these trends.

Indexed as

Family PracticePhysicians, FamilyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntariofamily physicianhealth services researchprimary careworkforce

Identifiers

PMID40425467
PMCPMC12120165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.