ArticleBMJ open2025
Taking action, return-to-work strategies used by Iranian cancer survivors: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe transition back to work after cancer is a significant milestone for many survivors, affecting their financial stability, psychological well-being and overall quality of life. Return-to-work (RTW) process is often complicated by lingering physical and cognitive impairments, changes in self-identity and workplace dynamics. Understanding how cancer survivors navigate this process is crucial for the development of effective support systems. This study aimed to explore strategies employed by cancer survivors in managing the RTW process.
designThis study employed a qualitative content analysis approach to explore RTW strategies used by cancer survivors.
settingThe study was conducted at a referral cancer centre and the workplaces of cancer survivors located in East Azerbaijan, Iran.
participantsA total of 22 cancer survivors were selected using purposive sampling. These participants had completed primary cancer treatment and had rich and diverse RTW-related experiences. Data were collected through semi-structured, face-to-face interviews and then analysed using the inductive content analysis approach described by Graneheim and Lundman (2004).
results'Active Strategies for Returning to Work' constituted the main theme and consisted of three categories, including assessing the situation, self-accommodation and impressing the workplace.
conclusionsCancer survivors actively engaged in RTW. They evaluate their situations before returning to work, seek to accommodate themselves to their circumstances and impress their workplaces to gain the necessary support. Healthcare providers, employers and families, as the most influential parties in the RTW process of cancer survivors, should recognise survivors' positive strategies and provide informational, financial, emotional and occupational support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.