ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2025
Application of generative adversarial networks in the restoration of blurred optical coherence tomography images caused by optical media opacity in eyes.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the application of generative adversarial networks (GANs) to restore the blurred optical coherence tomography (OCT) images caused by optical media opacity in eyes.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, a spectral-domain OCT (Zeiss Cirrus 5000, Germany) was used to scan the macula of 510 eyes from 272 Chinese subjects. Optical media opacity was simulated with an algorithm for training set (420 normal eyes). Images for three test sets were from the following: 56 normal eyes before and after fitting neutral density filter (NDF), 34 eyes before and after cataract surgeries and 90 eyes processed by algorithm. GANs of pix2pix was trained with training set and restored blurred images in test sets. Structural similarity index (SSIM) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) were used to evaluate the performance of GANs.
resultsPSNR for test sets before and after image restoration was 18.37±0.44 and 19.94±0.29 for NDF (p<0.01), 16.65±0.99 and 16.91±0.26 for cataract (p=0.68) and 18.33±0.55 and 20.83±0.41 for algorithm regenerated graph (p<0.01), respectively. SSIM for test sets before and after image restoration was 0.85±0.02 and 1.00±0.00 for NDF (p<0.01), 0.92±0.07 and 0.97±0.02 for cataract (p<0.01) and 0.86±0.02 and 0.99±0.01 for algorithm regenerated graph (p<0.01), respectively.
conclusionsGANs can be used to restore blurred OCT images caused by optical media opacity in eyes. Future studies are warranted to optimise this technique before the application in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.