Trial reportClinical psychology & psychotherapy
Dropout From Trauma-Focused Treatment for Intimate Partner Violence Against Women.
Trial report in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Perceptions of Healthcare Professionals Regarding Violence Against Women in Ecuador: A Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Invisible Wounds: A Systematic Review of Domestic Violence Against Women.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The current study aimed to analyze the characteristics, and the factors associated with dropout from a trauma-focused (TF) cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) tailored for intimate partner violence against women (IPVAW) that has been shown to be effective. Ninety-one female survivors of IPVAW entered a randomized controlled trial comparing two versions of the TF-CBT, both delivered in eight weekly sessions and group format. A total of 37.4% of women who entered treatment dropped out during treatment; an additional 7.1% dropped out after randomization and before starting treatment. There were no significant differences in dropout rate between conditions. Most of the dropouts occurred before session 4 (68.3%) and were related to practical/external difficulties (63.4%). Regarding sociodemographic features, dropping out significantly related to younger age, being migrant and being unemployed or active working. For characteristics of violence, dropouts significantly differed from completers in time elapsed since the last violence episode (lower in dropouts). Finally, regarding their clinical state, women that dropped out scored significantly higher in posttraumatic cognitions and anxiety. Comparisons between dropouts due to practical/external difficulties and due to treatment-related issues showed significant differences in origin (more dropouts related to practical difficulties in migrant women) and time since last episode of violence (lower in dropouts due to treatment-related issues). Data highlight the need for personalized retention strategies for younger and migrant women and measures to facilitate the attendance to sessions prior to entering a TF-therapy. This is an analysis of data collected as part of a clinical trial preregistered as ISRCTN73702156.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.