Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40425166›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2025

The 'silent' half: diversity, function and the critical knowledge gap on female frog vocalizations.

Erika M Santana, Angela M Mendoza-Henao, Johana Goyes Vallejos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erika M SantanaInstituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5883-4284
Angela M Mendoza-HenaoRed Ecoacústica Colombia, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-6752-9238
Johana Goyes VallejosDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4717-3358

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloUniversity of Missouri
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anuran vocalizations are crucial for species recognition and social interactions, particularly in reproduction. Historically, research has focused almost exclusively on male calls, leading to a male-biased perspective in anuran bioacoustics. Female calls have been often neglected due to their softness, making them difficult to detect. This review provides an overview of female calling behaviour in anurans, addressing a critical gap in frog bioacoustics and sexual selection. Specifically, we aim to (i) provide an overview of the current state of knowledge of female calling in frogs, (ii) propose a standardized classification for anuran call types, (iii) identify general patterns and challenges, (iv) recommend best practices, and (v) highlight areas for further exploration. Our literature review indicates that female calls have been documented in 112 species across 53 genera and 29 families, representing approximately 1.43% of all described anuran species. However, most descriptions are anecdotal or purely descriptive, with few functional analyses. Our findings underscore the widespread but largely overlooked presence of calling females in anurans. Expanding our research efforts on female vocalizations will improve our understanding of anuran communication. We hope this review motivates researchers to consider female frogs in future behavioural, ecological and evolutionary studies.

Indexed as

AnuraVocalization, AnimalAnimalsFemaleAmphibiaanimal communicationAnurafemale anuran callfemale strategiessex-specific calls

Identifiers

PMID40425166
PMCPMC12115808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.