ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Large differences in the distribution of pelagic biomass as a result of sonar frequency choice.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Large differences in the distribution of pelagic biomass as a result of sonar frequency choice.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent efforts to understand the global distribution of pelagic fauna have primarily relied on 38 kHz sonar observations, using water-column backscatter as a proxy of biomass. However, backscatter gradients across ocean provinces are not always consistent with biomass observations from net sampling. This mismatch is particularly evident in temperate to polar transition zones due to changes in the resonance of pelagic fauna, which depends not only on the sonar frequency but also on the size of resonant organs such as fish swimbladders. Here, we investigate how sonar frequency choice changes our vision of pelagic ecosystems across latitudes. We analyse sonar observations at 38 and 18 kHz along with size distributions of swimbladdered fish species across the Indian Ocean Subantarctic Front. Our results show a shift from 38 to 18 kHz dominance towards the poles. More interestingly, backscatter differences across the Subantarctic Front are four times larger at 38 kHz compared to 18 kHz. Size distribution of fish suggests an increase of swimbladder volumes in subantarctic waters, which may explain the observed shift in frequency response. This study highlights the need to address swimbladder resonance variability across latitudes in order to correctly interpret large-scale sonar observations of pelagic fauna.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.