Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40424998›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025

Harnessing Molecular Techniques to Inform Species-Specific Hookworm Prevalence and Infection Intensity and Detect Strongyloides in Dak Lak Province, Vietnam.

Wenyu Liu, Adam W Bartlett, Katrina Blazek, Sze Fui Hii, Clare E F Dyer, Vito Colella, Rebecca J Traub, Dinh Ng-Nguyen, Susana Vaz Nery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wenyu LiuSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Adam W BartlettKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Katrina BlazekSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Sze Fui HiiMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Clare E F DyerKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Vito ColellaMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Rebecca J TraubMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Dinh Ng-NguyenFaculty of Animal Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Tay Nguyen University, Dak Lak, Vietnam.
Susana Vaz NeryKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is an increasingly recognized diagnostic tool for soil-transmitted helminths (STHs), overcoming limitations of microscopy. We compared qPCR with Kato-Katz (KK) and sodium nitrate flotation (SNF; specific gravities 1.2 and 1.3) in determining STH prevalence and infection intensity using samples from a community survey of 351 people in Dak Lak province, Vietnam. Established correlation formulas were used to convert qPCR cycle threshold values to eggs per gram to compare infection intensity. Sensitivity, specificity, and agreement between methods were also investigated. Hookworm was the predominant STH detected, with prevalences of 70.3% (95% CI: 63.6-76.9) by qPCR, 59.1% (95% CI: 46.3-72.4) by 1.2SNF, 56.5% (95% CI: 43.2-69.4) by 1.3SNF, and 47.8% (95% CI: 34.6-57.6) by KK. Detection of Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura was low across methods. Prevalences of zoonotic hookworm Ancylostoma ceylanicum and Strongyloides species by qPCR were 3.0% (95% CI: 1.3-6.4) and 17.3% (95% CI: 8.1-22.3), respectively. qPCR detected higher prevalence of moderate- (8.3% versus <2%) and heavy-intensity (9.4% versus 0%) infections than microscopy. The sensitivities of microscopy methods were 81.0% (1.2SNF), 75.8% (1.3SNF), and 67.4% (KK). Diagnostic agreement for hookworm was moderate between qPCR and KK and between qPCR and 1.3SNF, and it was good between qPCR and 1.2SNF. The superior performance of qPCR in detecting hookworm coupled with the capacity to differentiate hookworm species and detect Strongyloides spp. supports the role of qPCR to inform control strategies, particularly for zoonotic reservoirs and use of macrocyclic lactones.

Indexed as

Hookworm InfectionsStrongyloidesStrongyloidiasisAdolescentAdultAncylostomatoideaAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolFecesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID40424998
PMCPMC12360085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.