ArticleJournal of autoimmunity2025
Characterizing local antibody responses in the muscle of inclusion body myositis patients.
Article in Journal of autoimmunity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSporadic inclusion body myositis (IBM) is the most common adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. IBM etiology has been elusive, due to both degenerative and autoimmune disease features found on muscle biopsy, and significant disease heterogeneity. Investigating the role of antibodies in the muscle of IBM patients may improve our understanding of disease pathogenesis.
methodsWe used an IBM xenograft mouse model in which muscle biopsy tissue from IBM patients (n = 98) and controls (n = 131; including 54 from other types of myopathy) were implanted into immunodeficient mice (NOD-Rag1
resultsWith the MSD assay we found human IgG, IgA, and IgM in a larger percentage of IBM xenografted mice versus controls. Using PhIP-Seq, we found anti-microbial reactivities secreted from IBM muscle are prevalent amongst a healthy control population but autoantigen reactivities in IBM are more unique at the peptide and protein level. Additionally, NT5C1A (IgG/IgA and IgM) and TIF1γ (IgG/A) autoantibodies are secreted from muscle tissues of 4/18 and 10/18 IBM xenograft donors, respectively.
conclusionOur characterization of antibody responses within the muscle of IBM patients reveals that muscle-infiltrating B cells produce both disease-associated autoantibodies and a broad spectrum of antibodies targeting non-self antigens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.