ArticlePloS one2025
Manual therapists in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic -they remained in business, but how was their work environment and practice impacted?
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Swedish governmental strategy during the COVID-19-pandemic was to impose voluntary recommendations to limit viral spread, but to keep health care and important societal functions running. The objective of this study was to describe the work environment and practice of manual therapists, who were challenged by this strategy, in Sweden during a year of the pandemic.
methodsThe cohort study Corona And Manual Professions (CAMP) was studying chiropractors and naprapaths, registered in the public register of licensed manual therapists in Sweden, during the pandemic. Mixed methods were used to answer the research aims. Surveys were distributed in November 2020, during the second wave, and in February, May and November of 2021. The quantitative data were presented descriptively, with the development over time illustrated in graphs. The qualitative data from the free-text answers were analyzed using content analysis.
resultsIn total, 816 manual therapists (47% of the invited sample) were included in the study, of which between 275 and 662 participants answered the free-text questions. At baseline, most (60-65%) rated their knowledge of viral infections and their spread, of vulnerable patient groups, and of protective gear as fairly good or good. Most (68-70%) were able to follow the official recommendations, but decreased numbers of patients and changes in clinic routines were reported. There was a positive trend in caring adequately for patients and having access to protective gear. Manual therapists reported that they were unable to care for vulnerable patient groups, had to adhere to routines perceived as onerous, and found care to be less personalized.
conclusionAt the time of the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, manual therapists in Sweden encountered challenges regarding knowledge about pandemics and availability of protective equipment. Sweden's official recommendations were possible to implement by the manual therapists, but had adverse impacts on clinic activities and patient care. Despite this, over 50% were able to deliver adequate care for their patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.