ArticlePloS one2025
Targeted analysis of dyslexia-associated regions on chromosomes 6, 12 and 15 in large multigenerational cohorts.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic Signatures in an Italian Cohort of Parkinson's Disease Patients from Sicily.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Telerehabilitation of Developmental Dyslexia: Critical Considerations on Intervention Methods and Their Effectiveness.Brain sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dyslexia is a common learning impairment with a genetic basis that affects word reading and spelling. An increasing list of loci and genes have been implicated, but analyses to-date have investigated only limited genomic variation within each locus with no confirmed pathogenic variants identified. Our study is the first to comprehensively sequence both coding and cis-acting regulatory regions of such genes in a large study sample. In a collection of >2000 participants in families from three independent sites, we performed targeted capture and comprehensive sequencing of all exons and some regulatory elements of five candidate risk genes (DNAAF4, CYP19A1, DCDC2, KIAA0319 and GRIN2B) for which prior evidence for a role in dyslexia exists from more than one sample. We evaluated evidence for association in each of six dyslexia-related quantitative phenotypes (traits) using both individual common single nucleotide polymorphisms and aggregated rare variants. We detected no promoter alterations and few deleterious variants in the coding exons, none of which showed evidence of association with any trait. Single variant and aggregate testing of DNAAF4 failed to detect significant evidence of association with any of the traits. The other four genes provided evidence of association with one or more traits. A common variant downstream of CYP19A1 showed significant evidence of association with multiple traits with or without verbal IQ (VIQ) adjustment. A haplotype that stretches from the downstream region of KIAA0319 to the second intron of DCDC2 was associated with reduced performance on timed real word reading. Finally, rare exonic variants in GRIN2B were associated with performance on spelling, with or without adjustment for VIQ. Our findings from this large-scale sequencing study complement those from genome-wide association studies, argue against the causative involvement of large-effect coding variants in these five candidate genes, support a multigenic etiology, and suggest a role of transcriptional regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.