ArticlePloS one2025
Lightweight wavelet-CNN tea leaf disease detection.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Green-Making Stage Recognition of Tieguanyin Tea Based on Improved MobileNet V3.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A curated dataset and lightweight deep learning framework for tea leaf disease classification.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tea diseases can significantly impact crop yield and quality, necessitating accurate and efficient recognition methods. This study presents WaveLiteNet, a lightweight model designed for tea disease recognition, addressing the challenge of inadequate disease feature extraction in existing approaches. By integrating 2D discrete wavelet transform (DWT) with MobileNetV3, the model enhances noise suppression and feature extraction through an adaptive thresholding strategy in the 2D DWT. The extracted frequency-domain features are fused with depth features from the Bneck structure, enabling a more comprehensive representation of disease characteristics. To further optimize feature extraction, a convolutional block attention module (CBAM) is incorporated within the Bneck structure, refining the network's ability to assign optimal weights to feature channels. A focal loss function also replaces traditional cross-entropy loss to mitigate sample category imbalance, improving recognition accuracy across varying distributions. Experimental results show that WaveLiteNet achieves a 98.70% recognition accuracy on five types of tea leaf diseases, with a parameter count of 3.16 × 10⁶. Compared to MobileNetV3, this represents a 2.15 percentage point improvement in accuracy while reducing the parameter count by 25.12%. These findings underscore WaveLiteNet's potential as a highly efficient and lightweight real-time crop disease recognition solution, particularly in resource-constrained agricultural environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.