Observational studyMedicine2025
Discriminative ability of functional performance tests on risk of falling among older adults with knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Kinematics Limit the Potential to Capitalize on Available Muscle Strength During Sit-to-Stand for Patients Before and After Total Knee Arthroplasty.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying fall risk among older adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA) is essential for targeted prevention. Although functional tests assessing mobility, strength, and balance are widely used, no consensus exists on the most effective test to identify fall risk in this population. This study aimed to compare functional performance tests and fall risk between older adults with and without knee OA, compare the tests in older adults with and without fall risk in both groups, and determine cutoff scores for these tests to identify fall risk among older adults with knee OA. This cross-sectional study included 106 participants aged ≥ 60 years (53 in each group). The participants completed the Thai falls risk assessment test and performed 5 functional performance tests, including the timed-up and go test (TUGT), functional reach test, alternate-step test (AST), 5 times sit-to-stand test (FTSST), and 10-meter walk test (10MWT). The independent t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare outcomes, and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to identify the optimal cutoff scores. Older adults with knee OA had a higher fall risk and performed significantly worse on the TUGT, AST, FTSST, and 10MWT than those without knee OA. The TUGT and AST scores effectively distinguished the fall risk between older adults with and without knee OA. cutoff scores of 10.5 and 24.5 seconds for the TUGT and AST, respectively, had acceptable area under curve values, effectively discriminating fall risk among older adults with knee OA. Older adults with knee OA exhibit a higher risk of falls and reduced functional abilities. The TUGT and AST may serve as useful fall-risk screening tools among this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.