ArticlePloS one2025
Identification of a novel chemotherapy benefit index for patients with advanced ovarian cancer based on Bayesian network analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of MZB1 in disease pathogenesis: current insights and future directions.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Research progress on the role of MZB1 in immune regulation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy and optimize treatment strategies for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
methodsBased on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) transcriptome data, we conducted correlation and Bayesian network analyses to identify key genes strongly associated with chemotherapy prognosis. Reverse Transcription Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to verify the expression of these key genes. The Chemotherapy Benefit Index (CBI) was developed using these genes via multivariable Cox regression analysis, and validated using both internal and external validation sets (GSE32062 and GSE30161) with a random forest model. Subsequently, we analyzed distinct molecular characteristics and explored additional immunotherapy in CBI-high and CBI-low subgroups.
resultsBased on the network and machine learning analyses, CBI was developed from the following ten genes: COL6A3, SPI1, HSF1, CD3E, PIK3R4, MZB1, FERMT3, GZMA, PSMB9 and RSF1. Significant differences in overall survival were observed among the CBI-high, medium, and low subgroups (P < 0.001), which were consistent with the two external validation sets (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003). The AUC of internal validation and two external validation cohorts were 0.87, 0.71 and 0.70, respectively. Molecular function analysis indicated that the CBI-low subgroup is characterized by the activation of cancer-related signaling pathways, immune-related biological processes, higher TP53 mutation rate, particularly with a better response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) treatment, while the CBI-high subgroup is characterized by inhibition of cell cycle, less response to ICB treatment, and potential therapeutic targets.
conclusionsThis study provided a novel CBI for patients with advanced ovarian cancer through network analyses and machine learning. CBI could serve as a prognostic prediction tool for patients with advanced ovarian cancer, and also as a potential indicator for immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.