Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40424322›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The impact of VUS reclassification on reproductive decision making.

Alexandra Peyser, Kenan Onel, Avner Hershlag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandra PeyserNorthwell, New Hyde Park, New York; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, New York; Zucker School of Medicine, Uniondale, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7516-9810
Kenan OnelRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.
Avner HershlagDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaboratories will occasionally reclassify a VUS to pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP), making it clinically actionable. Here, we aim to characterize the frequency of this reclassification in genes tested routinely during preconception counseling in order to help guide reproductive decision making.

designUtilizing the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) 113-gene pre-conception panel, we conducted data analysis from ClinVar Miner (https://clinvarminer.genetics.utah.edu/). The numbers of VUS's reported for each gene were recorded over a 3-year period (2019, 2021, & 2022). In addition, data on the number of VUS's in conflict (VUS/P and VUS/LP) were recorded. The 10 genes with the most VUS's and the genes with the most frequent reporting discordance were compared over the 3 years.

resultsThere was a 103% increase in the number of VUS's reported (2019: 13,278, 2021: 22,434, 2022: 26,965) and a 235% increase in the number of VUS's in conflict (2019:387, 2021: 946, 2022:1297). The overall percent conflict increased significantly (2019: 2.9% vs. 2022: 4.8%). Nine genes among the top 10 with the most frequent VUS's remained the same over the 3-year period, while five out of the ten most frequent genes with VUS's in conflict remained the same.

conclusionsThe rate of conflicting reporting of a VUS has increased in 3 years and is currently at 4.8%. A potential upgrade of a VUS to pathogenic or likely pathogenic may turn the variant "actionable," justifying testing embryos for the variant through PGT-M.

Indexed as

Decision MakingGenetic TestingReproductionFemaleGenetic CounselingHumans

Identifiers

PMID40424322
PMCPMC12111534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.