Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40424278›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

How people with type 2 diabetes in Kuwait manage the condition: A thematic analysis and conceptual framework.

Zainab Meer, Ebaa Al-Ozairi, Sruthi Ranganathan, Genevie Fernandes, Jay Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zainab MeerLeeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Ebaa Al-OzairiClinical Research Unit, Dasman Diabetes Institute, Dasman, Kuwait.
Sruthi RanganathanSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Genevie FernandesCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Jay PatelCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8188-6784

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundType 2 diabetes is a growing non-communicable disease burden across the Eastern Mediterranean region, particularly in Kuwait. The methods that patients adopt to manage the condition following diagnosis is poorly understood. This study aimed to explore these methods using a qualitative approach, and develop a conceptual framework characterising the phases that patients transition through.

methodsThis was a qualitative, thematic evaluation of a grounded theory methodology investigating the methods that patients with type 2 diabetes employ to manage their condition. Qualitative coding of semi-structured interview transcripts with 22 patients, over three phases: initial, focused and theoretical, enabled categorical themes and phases to be identified. The findings were synthesised into a conceptual framework that represented the transitional journey.

resultsThe development of conceptual framework revealed five transitional categorical phases that characterised the journey: (1) experiencing unusual symptoms; (2) accepting the diagnosis; (3) adopting management strategies; (4) adherence and relapse; and (5) adaptation.

conclusionIn Kuwait, patients with type 2 diabetes appear to transition through relatively predictable stages in learning to manage their condition. Clinical consideration of this transition could improve the quality of diabetes care provision for these patients.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedFemaleHumansKuwaitMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSelf Care

Identifiers

PMID40424278
PMCPMC12111489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.