ArticlePloS one2025
Comparison of orbital structures between age-related distance esotropia and acute acquired concomitant esotropia.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of the Surgical Treatment for Strabismus According to Its Type: Esotropia Versus Exotropia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of age-related distance esotropia (ARDE) with those of age-matched healthy controls and acute acquired concomitant esotropia (AACE) patients.
methodsCoronal MRI scans of 16 ARDE cases, 15 AACE cases, 26 elderly controls cases, and 22 young controls cases were analyzed to measure (1) the displacement angles of the lateral rectus (LR) and medial rectus (MR), (2) the LR tilting angle, (3) the ratio of the MR-to-LR cross-sectional areas (CSAs), and (4) the superior rectus (SR) downward displacement ratio (SDR).
resultsARDE patients showed significant LR sagging relative to elderly controls, by 5.1° (p = 0.048), while there was no significant LR displacement in AACE relative to young controls. ARDE patients also exhibited marked LR tilting relative to all other groups. Additionally, the MR-to-LR CSA ratios were 26% (p = 0.002) and 27% (p = 0.001) higher in the ARDE and AACE groups than in the controls, respectively, indicating imbalance in the horizontal rectus (HR). Additionally, SDR values were higher in ARDE and elderly controls, suggesting that a closer proximity of the SR muscle to the globe is an age-related alteration.
conclusionThe findings demonstrate that ARDE is characterized by unique orbital changes, particularly in the LR, that distinguish it from AACE. The observed increase in the MR-to-LR CSA ratio among the esotropia groups points to an imbalance of HR tension. These MRI-based insights enhance our comprehension of the unique pathophysiology of these conditions, helping to distinguish ARDE from AACE in acquired esotropia and guiding customized treatments strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.