ArticlePloS one2025
Post-abortion contraceptive use among currently married women in India: New evidence from National Family Health Survey 2019-2021 (NFHS-5).
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-abortion contraceptive use is a critical element of reproductive healthcare aimed at preventing unintended pregnancies and promoting reproductive agency. This study investigates changes in post-abortion contraceptive use and factors associated with that use. We use reproductive calendars implemented in 2015-16 and 2019-21 National Family Health Surveys (NFHS) to investigate changes in post-abortion contraceptive use among currently married women age 15-49 in India. We then use 2019-21 NFHS to examine the factors associated with post-abortion contraceptive use. Our analysis is based on a weighted sample of 5,473 women from NFHS-4 and 5,103 women from NFHS-5. The study employs a two-stage estimation procedure using the Inverse Mills Ratio (IMR) framework to address potential biases in abortion reporting. In the second stage, we used a multinomial probit regression model to assess factors influencing post-abortion contraceptive use. Post-abortion contraceptive use increased from 49% in NFHS-4 to 57% in NFHS-5. Multinomial probit regression analysis revealed that gestational age of abortion was negatively associated with post-abortion contraceptive use, while factors such as having a son or prior contraceptive use increased the likelihood. Women who had abortions in private or non-health facilities were less likely to use post-abortion Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives (LARC), compared to public health facilities. Those who reported unplanned pregnancy or contraceptive failure as the reason for abortion were more likely to use traditional methods of post-abortion contraception. Our findings highlight the importance of integrating family planning services into abortion care and ensuring comprehensive information and counselling on contraceptive options during the post-abortion period, as crucial measures to improve women's health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.