Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40424215›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Understanding PrEP misconceptions and their impact on PrEP initiation and use among pregnant and lactating women in Malawi.

Alinda M Nyamaizi, Marley Catlett, Friday Saidi, Twambilile Phanga, Jennifer Tseka, Agatha Bula, Lisa D Pearce, Suzanne Maman, Carol E Golin, Wilbroad Mutale and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alinda M NyamaiziDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9277-967X
Marley CatlettDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Friday SaidiUNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1190-1499
Twambilile PhangaUNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Jennifer TsekaUNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Agatha BulaUNC Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Lisa D PearceDepartment of Sociology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Suzanne MamanDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Carol E GolinDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Wilbroad MutaleDepartment of Health Policy, University of Zambia School of Public Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Benjamin H ChiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Lauren M HillDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9444-4435

Funding

Promoting PrEP shared decision-making and adherence among pregnant and breastfeeding women in ZambiaK01MH121186 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HILL, LAUREN · 2020 to 2024
$906k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH121186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV remains a challenge in Eastern and Southern Africa. Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a powerful tool to reduce MTCT, but women face barriers to effective use including those related to inaccurate comprehension of PrEP To understand women's misconceptions about PrEP and their potential impact on PrEP use, we conducted interviews with 33 pregnant and lactating women in Malawi using PrEP, and ten PrEP counselors and clinicians. The results indicate that, although pregnant women generally understood PrEP's features and functions, many held misconceptions that persisted over the course of their PrEP use and impacted their perceptions and use of the medication. Some women erroneously believed that PrEP could treat and prevent sexually transmitted infections other than HIV, which motivated some to keep taking PrEP while motivating others to stop using PrEP once their STI had resolved. Some were confused about PrEP's function, with some believing it was the same as antiretroviral therapy for HIV treatment, and others believing that PrEP could be used for overall enhancement of health. Rarer misconceptions included fears that PrEP was connected to satanic practices, could cause cancer, or was solely for individuals engaged in sex work. These misconceptions stemmed from a mix of prior knowledge, societal influences, and miscommunications during counseling sessions. Ensuring accurate knowledge and addressing common misconceptions head-on is crucial to promote continued PrEP use among women. Both clinic- and community-based communication efforts with a particular focus on the difference between PrEP, STI treatments, and ART are needed.

Identifiers

PMID40424215
PMCPMC12111267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.