Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40424173›Full record

ReviewCancer cytopathology2025

The diagnostic challenges of medullary thyroid carcinoma: A practical guide for cytopathologists.

Marc P Pusztaszeri, Zahra Maleki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer cytopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marc P PusztaszeriDepartment of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6490-4189
Zahra MalekiDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3273-4802

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare but potentially aggressive neuroendocrine tumor arising from the thyroid C cells (parafollicular cells) that produce calcitonin, representing 1%-3% of thyroid malignancies but contributing to up to 15% of thyroid cancer-related deaths. Early detection is critical for improving survival and outcomes because its tumor origin, treatment, and prognosis differ completely from papillary thyroid carcinoma. However, the low incidence of MTC and its variable cytomorphology can pose significant diagnostic challenges for cytopathologists. Referred to as the great mimicker, MTC can resemble various primary and metastatic tumors, complicating its identification, particularly in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies. Reported FNA sensitivity for a specific MTC diagnosis varies widely from 12.5% to 88.2%, with a 2014 meta-analysis estimating an overall sensitivity of 56.5% when including suspicious lesions. False-negative FNA results, often caused by misinterpretation of cytologic features or inadequate specimen quality, can lead to delayed or suboptimal treatment. Pathologists must be familiar with MTC's diverse cytopathologic presentation and maintain a low threshold for additional diagnostic tests to ensure an accurate preoperative diagnosis. This review article provides practical guidance on diagnosing MTC, emphasizing cytologic features, ancillary studies, mimickers, and common diagnostic pitfalls, serving as a valuable resource for cytopathologists, general pathologists, and trainees to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient care.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, NeuroendocrineThyroid NeoplasmsBiopsy, Fine-NeedleCytodiagnosisDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansPrognosiscalcitonincarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)cytologyfine‐needle aspirationmedullary thyroid carcinomathyroid

Identifiers

PMID40424173
PMCPMC12110738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.