Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40424099›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2025

Efficacy of oral remdesivir in treating feline infectious peritonitis: a prospective observational study of 29 cats.

Kelsey Ann Renner, Ryan Cattin, Benjamin Kimble, John Munday, Alex White, Sally Coggins

Abstract readObservational Study, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kelsey Ann RennerAnimal Referral Centre, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5680-4257
Ryan CattinAnimal Referral Centre, Auckland, New Zealand.
Benjamin KimbleSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
John MundaySchool of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Alex WhiteIndependent researcher, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9434-4581
Sally CogginsSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8683-5014

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectivesThe primary aim of this prospective observational study was to document clinical progression, survival, remission and relapse in New Zealand cats with feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) that were treated with compounded oral remdesivir with or without initial parenteral remdesivir therapy. The secondary aims were to determine the optimal monitoring protocols and report the adverse effects of treatment and complications associated with FIP.MethodsA total of 29 client-owned cats with a clinical diagnosis of FIP were prospectively recruited. Cats were administered oral remdesivir (30 mg/kg q24h), rounded up to the nearest capsule size as the sole treatment, or after initial parenteral remdesivir (15-30 mg/kg q24h). Rechecks were recommended at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 during treatment, and at 2 and 12 weeks after treatment. A full physical examination (including neurological and ophthalmic examination) and point-of-care ultrasound were performed at each recheck. A complete blood count and biochemistry panel were performed at weeks 4, 8, 12 and 24. Molnupiravir was offered as a rescue therapy for cats that relapsed.ResultsIn total, 25 (86%) cats entered remission and survived beyond 6 months (range 6-27). A total of 22 (75%) cats achieved remission within 84 days while receiving oral remdesivir. Three cats received subsequent molnupiravir rescue therapy to achieve remission. Five cats (20%) experienced relapse: four with non-effusive disease and one with effusive disease. Notably, 4/8 (50%) non-effusive cases relapsed, compared with only 1/20 (5%) with effusive disease.Conclusions and relevanceThis study demonstrates that oral remdesivir at a dose rate of 30 mg/kg q24h is an effective treatment for effusive FIP. The survival rate in non-effusive cats was significantly lower; therefore, an increased dose rate or frequency of administration should be considered in these cats. Oral remdesivir is a viable antiviral option where GS-441524 is unavailable.

Indexed as

Adenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsFeline Infectious PeritonitisAdministration, OralAnimalsCatsFemaleMaleProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral Agentsremdesivirantiviralfeline coronavirusFeline infectious peritonitisGS-441524GS-5734nucleotide analogueremdesivir

Identifiers

PMID40424099
PMCPMC12117242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.